Word of the Week – Monster

Word of the Week – Monster

A couple weeks ago as Halloween stuff was everywhere, my family was talking one night about the word monster and where it might have come from. We were musing that since it ends in -ster, and -ster usually indicates “someone who does a particular task” (like spinster is one who spins, mobster is one who belongs to a mob, hipster is one who is hip), then clearly monster is someone who…er…mons. Whatever that might be. 😉 We decided it was someone who moans and proceeded to be moaning monsters…

Turns out this time we were WAY off, ha ha. In this case, that -ster ending is coincidental. Monster in fact comes from the Latin monstrum, which means “a bad omen, portend, or sign; something misshapen.”

See, in the ancient days, any time an animal or person was born with some deformity, it was believed that it was a sign of bad things to come. And in fact, after a bad thing happened, historians would search for the bad omen that should have warned them about it. The first chunk of Histories by Herodotus if full of all the evil portends, monsters, and abnormalities that had been found in the country in the decades leading up to the war. So a creature–whether human or animal–who displayed these visible signs would be called monstrous or a monster.

If you look at the root of that word itself, it’s actually from monere, “to remind or bring to mind.” Which is what an omen does, I suppose.

Word of the Week – Story

Word of the Week – Story

I’m sure we’ve all noticed that history and story look mighty similar. Well, for good reason–they’re both taken directly from the same French word, estoire or estorie,which came in turn from Latin and Greek. The literal meaning is “a chronicle of events,” and has been the meaning pretty much forever.

It took on its “fictional” connotation–a tale meant to entertain–around 1500. Even then, story and history were still used fairly interchangeably for quite a while. And it wasn’t until around 1690 that the word first appeared as a euphemism for a lie. It was first applied to “a newspaper article” around 1892.

Another interesting tidbit is the other definition of story–a floor of a building. This is from the same root word, and historians’ best guess as to why is that in the Middle Ages, the few buildings that had multiple stories with windows would have had stained glass or painted windows, which of course depicted…you guessed it! Stories. How fun is that?

Word of the Week – Caffeine

Word of the Week – Caffeine

Last week, my son and I were (for some reason I can’t recall) talking about caffeine, and how it occurs naturally in coffee. Which led him to ask, “Is that where the word caffeine comes from? From coffee?”

Insert me going, “Huh. You know, I bet it does…” and pulling up the etymology site on my computer (by which I mean clicking into the tab that is always open, LOL). And sure enough!

Caffeine comes directly from the German Kaffe and was in fact originally spelled kaffein. Named for it because it naturally occurs in coffee. Pretty straight forward! The stimulant itself was identified around 1830. So there you go. Score one for the boy who doesn’t even like that glorious brew like the rest of the family does… 😉

Word of the Week – Disgruntled + Gruntle

Word of the Week – Disgruntled + Gruntle

I saw a Facebook post a couple weeks ago in which someone realized disgruntled was the opposite of gruntled–a word they’d never heard before, but which they were “very gruntled to learn about.” I got a good laugh out of it…so naturally, had to look it up. Though in this case, the looking-up taught me that it wasn’t quite as straightforward as all that.

Back in the Middle Ages, gruntled meant “to grumble or complain.” Apparently occasionally the prefix dis- means “very, entirely,” which is what it does in this case (who knew?). So disgruntle began its life as a verb that meant “to disappoint, offend, or throw into a sulky state.” The verb was rarely used as a regular verb, though–mostly only as a past participle, disgruntled. Which has been a common word since 1680.

It wasn’t until 1938 that someone thought it would be fun to create a back-form for gruntle, that means the opposite of disgruntled–namely, “pleased, satisfied.” By this time, the original meaning of gruntle (“to grunt”) had been lost to the mists of the past, so the word was wide open to new meaning. 😉

I’m sure you’re very gruntled to learn about that too.

Word of the Week – Greg (That’s Right, Greg)

Word of the Week – Greg (That’s Right, Greg)

Did you know that greg is Latin for “flock or herd”? Yeah, neither did I. 😉 But that then makes sense when we look at some of the words that have greg as their root:

Congregate – to come together as a group
Segregate
– to separate from a group

And then the one that got my attention – gregarious. I wouldn’t have thought that one so closely related, I admit. Until we consider that it means “someone who enjoys being with a group of people, the company of others.”

So there we have it. And now you can start calling that Greg you know “flock” or “herd” and see what he says. 😉

Word of the Week – The Dickens

Word of the Week – The Dickens

A phrase from the archives today…Original post published 2/20/2017
Another special request today, though there isn’t quite as much information on it as there was on last week’s . . .
The question was where the expression “the dickens” comes from.
Well, the answer’s a bit unclear. What we know is that it’s an English last name, taken from Richard. We’re not sure which Richard, or why the name became an exclamation; Shakespeare used the expression “I cannot tell what the dickens his name is.” (“Merry Wives of Windsor” Act 3, Scene 2), in which it’s clear that it’s a substitute for “the devil.” As for why? [Insert shrug here] Best guess by the Oxford English Dictionary is that it’s simply because it sounds similar.
There’s another bit of history surrounding it too, to account for some of its early uses. Apparently, in the 1500s there was a maker of wooden bowls who was rather infamous for losing money, to the degree that much literature of the 1500s would refer to bad investments as “bad as Dickens.”
Whatever the why, modern readers can be assured it has nothing to do with the Dickens with whom we are most familiar–Charles–as it predates him by several hundred years. 😉