Word of the Week – Silly

Word of the Week – Silly

If you look up silly in the dictionary today, you come across a couple definitions.

1 a: exhibiting or indicative of a lack of common sense or sound judgment
   b: weak in intellect
   c: playfully lighthearted and amusing
   d: trifling, frivolous
2: being stunned or dazed

Those all match the uses I know I’ve seen for the word, right? And it’s a word I’ve used a lot when my kids were younger for when they were acting goofy. Silly is a word we often said with laughter, with joy. It’s a fun word.

And I had no idea that it began life meaning something rather different.

In Middle English, the word was spelled seely, and it was taken from the Old English equivalent that meant “happy, fortuitous, prosperous.” The Old English came in turn from the Old German selig, which means “blessed, happy, blissful.”

The fact that the pronunciation, and hence the spelling, changed is no great surprise–that long double E was shortened and changed to an I in either speech or spelling or both in all sorts of words. But the progression of the meaning is fascinating.

The journey went something like this. From “happy” it moved into “blessed.” But “blessed” was used primarily of religious giftings, so silly began to mean “pious” or “innocent” around 1200. As with many other words that had something to do with “innocent,” by the end of the century, it could mean “harmless”…and from there, it shifted to “pitiable” and “weak.” Throughout the 1400s and 1500s, it evolved into “feeble in mind, foolish, lacking reason.”

Of course, we know that innocence does not mean foolish…but all too often, we equate the two.

By the mid-to-late 1800s, the idea of being knocked silly, as in “dazed or stunned by a blow” entered the picture. But just a bit before that, in 1858, we also a see that connection to childhood things that I associate the word with–“a silly person” was one who wrote for or entertained children (how fun is that?).

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Word of the Week – Flirt

Word of the Week – Flirt

With Valentine’s Day upon us, I thought it would be fun to pick a “romantic” word to examine today…and flirt wins because it’s a rather hilarious evolution. Because it didn’t always mean what it does now!

In fact, flirt began life in English around 1550 as the very opposite of what we think of today. It means “to turn your nose up or sneer at someone.”

Say whaaaaaat?

Not long after that, flirt and flick were used interchangeably…and then flirt and flit would be used interchangeably. This is a word that just didn’t know what it wanted to mean!

So how did it come to land on its current meaning? Etymologists have several theories. It could be because flit was used frequently to describe the actions of “giddy girls.” Or it could have been influenced by the French fleureter, which was “to speak sweet nonsense,” a word that was used to describe bees flitting from pretty flower to pretty flower and was borrowed to describe people who did the same, especially in conversation.

At any rate, our current meaning had evolved by the 1770s…and this flitting, flicking, flirting word finally settled on a meaning. And it hasn’t looked back since.

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Word of the Week – Nervous

Word of the Week – Nervous

When we look at the word nervous, we immediately see that root word of nerves in there, so it’s no surprise to learn that the original, scientific meaning of the word was simply “something that contains nerves, affecting the sinews.” It comes via the Latin nervus, which meant “sinew, nerve.” Nervous began being used in that technical sense in the 1300s, and by the 1660s, it was used for anything “belonging to the nerves” as well.

Here’s the interesting bit though. Starting around 1630, it began to take on a metaphorical sense…but definitely NOT the one we’re familiar with! It was used to mean “showing vigor of mind, characterized by force or strength,” and was frequently used in reference to things like writing styles or energetic performances.

So when did our modern meaning begin to appear? Well, by the 1730s, the opposite meaning from the one above–“suffering a disorder of the nervous system”–had entered the language. And from there, it only took a decade for our familiar “restless, agitated, lacking nerve, weak, timid, easily agitated” definition to be established.

Interestingly, this meaning became so popular and so common that scientists were forced to coin the term neurological to differentiate actual “nervous system” meanings from the new definition!

Nervous wreck appeared as a phrase in the 1860s, as did nervous breakdown.

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Word of the Week – Meat

Word of the Week – Meat

Did you know that meat didn’t always mean “the flesh of warm-blooded animals used for food”?

Nope. The word meat actually comes from the Old English mete, which was used for ANY food or sustenance, including what was fed to animals, and could even mean “a meal.” It came from Proto-Geremanic meti, which then influenced many Germanic languages through the ages in their words for food.

But by around the 1300, the meaning quoted above began to edge out the broader sense, basically as a shortening of “flesh-meat,” which was used before that. By even into the 1400s, vegetables were still called “grene-mete,” and dairy was “white-mete.” We still see that earlier meaning preserved in a few random dishes/items, like sweetmeat and mincemeat.

Dark meat and light/white meat became popular distinctions when talking about fowl in the 19th century. Meatloaf is first recorded in 1876.

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Word of the Week – Spinster

Word of the Week – Spinster

If I were to ask you what spinster means, what would you say? My answer would be the typical one: “an unmarried woman who’s older than the perceived prime age for marriage.” And that’s what the word has come to mean, yes.

But did you know that originally it referred to any unmarried daughter, no matter how young?

Let’s look at the word itself. As soon as we pause to consider it, we see that its original meaning of “a woman who spins yarn” makes perfect sense, right? Spin is right there in it, and that -ster ending just means “one who does.” So…why is this applied to unmarried women? Well, the word dates from the 1300s, and from that time forward into nearly-modern ages, girls who weren’t yet married were expected to fill their time with something useful and productive, especially the family’s spinning.

What’s fascinating is that from the 1600s until the 1900s, spinster was actually a legal definition in England of “all unmarried women, from a viscount’s daughter downward.”

So if you were nobility, you weren’t expected to spin, hence wouldn’t be a spinster if you were unwed. But all us commoners? We were all spinsters as long as we were single! It wasn’t until 1719 that the “past her prime” connotation began to arise.

We can also note that in its technical sense of “one who spins,” it was a word that could be applied to either gender. In the 1640s, the feminine variation of spinstress also arose…and also meant “maiden lady.”

Makes you wonder what the modern equivalent would be, doesn’t it?

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Word of the Week – Awful and Awesome

Word of the Week – Awful and Awesome

It’s kind of funny, isn’t it. When we say the word awe, we know that it means “an emotion variously combining dread, veneration, and wonder that is inspired by authority or by the sacred or sublime.

And yet, what do we think when we saw awful? Or awesome? We can see at a glance that both words are from that root–and indeed, both once meant the same thing.

Yet in modern vernacular, both of these words have drifted from their root word…and they’ve drifted in opposite directions. It’s fascinating to look at how and when and why. And to realize that awe, in its own definition, carries the potential for both positive and negative feelings, right? Dread is bad. Wonder is good.

Awful, at the start, could be either. It was simply “full of awe.” And it wasn’t until 1809 that it laid claim to all the negative parts of awe and came to used strictly for “exceedingly bad.”

Awesome actually came on the scene nearly 300 years later, and first was mostly positive, focused on “profoundly reverential” since the 1590s. In the next hundred years that dread worked its way back in. And it wasn’t until 1960 that it veered from all things reverential and simply began to mean “impressive, very good.”

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts