Let Your Peace Return to You

Let Your Peace Return to You

“And if the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it, but if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you. And if anyone will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet when you leave that house or town.” ~ Matthew 10:13-14

I’ll admit it. I always felt like I was missing something in these verses above. Something about that subjunctive phrase–the same structure used for God calling the universe into being, that let there be…–made me scratch my head. Or more accurately, made me wonder at the nature of peace, if it’s something that can go out from us to settle on a place but then can return to us.

Return to us, that is, in very specific situations–when people refuse to hear the Good News. When people won’t listen.

I understand, of course, that the shaking off of the dust is a testimony against those people (hence verse 15, which says it’ll be better for Sodom and Gomorrah than for that place in the last days–harsh judgment here!), but I still found it curious that it was linked to peace.

It’s something that hovers in the back of my mind whenever we’re talking about or studying peace. And in the current political climate (okay, in any political climate), there are certainly people shaking things at other people all over the place. Fingers, heads, and probably that metaphorical dust too.

You know what I’m not seeing a lot of? Peace. I don’t see it resting upon many houses, and I don’t see it returning to people either.

Something else continued to nag at me too. Was Jesus really telling us to give up on those people forever? He, who hung on the cross and forgave those who put them there? I can’t think so. Because a person or family or town who doesn’t hear the Gospel in one moment has historically had their “come to Jesus” moment later. Someone else went back to that person or house or town, and the result was different. As Paul points out, sometimes the seeds one person plants need to be watered by a second, tended by a third, and see the harvest with a fourth.

Why, then, does Jesus give this instruction?

I don’t think it’s just about those people who aren’t listening. I think He told us this for the sake of our hearts. Our minds. Our souls.

Because He knows us–He knows we worry. We fret. We obsess. We feel guilty. We take on ourselves what isn’t ours to carry. Jesus is telling the disciples He’s sending out, “Don’t take it personally. Be impartial. When people don’t hear you, don’t let it upset you. Let your peace return to you and move on.”

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t pray for people. It doesn’t mean they’re a lost cause.

It means we’ve done OUR part right NOW. It means we need to hand judgment over to Him and take a step back. We need to relinquish control. We need to trust Him. Cling to hope. Let go of what we wanted to see happen.

Be at peace. It’s not just a command. Jesus isn’t telling us DO THIS. That subjunctive is way more subtle. It’s an invitation that carries authority. The same Voice that said, “Let there be light” is saying “Let your peace return to you.”

What are we clinging to in concern that we need to let go of?

What contention are we holding that’s keeping our hearts from being at peace?

What effort do we need to step away from so that He can come in and do His work, or so that someone else can have their shot?

What house do we need to leave so that our peace can return to us?

Word of the Week – Green

Word of the Week – Green

Happy St. Patrick’s Day!

In honor of the holiday of “the wearin o’ the green,” I thought we’d take a look at the history of green today.

Not surprisingly, various spellings of green have been around as long as English itself has been (Old English was grene), and also not surprisingly, it has Germanic roots which means that other Germanic languages have cognates. So where did it originate?

The root of the word is ghre-, which means “to grow.” Makes sense, right? Note that grass comes from this same root. Green is denoted as “the color of living plants.”

As early as the 1100s, green could mean “covered with grass or foliage” as well as “the appearance of someone who’s sick,” and from the 1300s onward, we’ve used it to refer to unripened fruit or vegetables…and hence also the metaphorical sense of people who are immature. Round about 1600, that metaphorical sense extended to mean “gullible.”

So what about some phrases with green in them?

One of the oldest is actually green room; I expected this to be linked to film, but in fact it’s rooted in stage and has been used since 1701 to mean the “room for actors that are not on stage.” Why? Well, the best guess is that a well-known one was painted green. 😉 Green light comes (no surprises here) from the lights used on railroads as early as 1883 to signal a train had permission to enter the tracks, but it didn’t enter the vernacular for a general sense of “permission” until 1937. And one year later in 1938, green thumb also came along for someone who’s good at gardening (I thought that one would be older!). Using green to refer to environmentalism is from 1971.

Are you wearing green today?

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

What If We…?

What If We…?

What if we mourned with those who mourn…even when we’re happy about what has them sad?

What if we listened to the people we disagree with, not to gather ammunition to use against them, but to understand their point of view?

What if we prayed for our opposition instead of about them?

What if we stop looking for “gotcha!” moments and started looking for what we have in common?

What if we read things out of our comfort zone?

What if we sought not to tear down but to build up?

What if we paused before hitting “like” or “post” and asked, “Will this show others the love of Christ?”

What if we refused to put labels on people, and instead called each of them “beloved of the Father”?

What if we chose patience and kindness instead of outrage and condemnation?

What if we refused to boast about our “wins”?

What if we were willing to “lose” if it would help others see God’s love?

What if we refused to show disrespect to someone just because we disagree with them?

What if we pursued their desires above our own?

What if we were the last to be angered instead of the first?

What if we kept no record of the wrongs we perceive being done to us?

What if we rejoiced, not when we get our way, but when we make a friend of someone once an enemy?

What if we protected those who are desperate and alone instead of our own self-interest?

What if we were willing to trust that God’s love is bigger than our differences?

What if we hoped in Him instead of our own power?

What if we persevered in building bridges instead of burning them down?

What if our first, gut, knee-jerk reaction was love instead of hate?

Word of the Week – Again(st)

Word of the Week – Again(st)

Time for yet another look at a word so common we probably don’t even think about it. But pause for a second and consider these two: again and against. They look strikingly similar, don’t they? Coincidence?

Far from it.

Again actually traces its roots allllll the way back to Old English, when it could be either a preposition or an adverb and meant “toward; opposite, contrary to”…you know, what we think of as against.

In the 1100s, the variation with that -st ending appeared, but the two variations were used interchangeably. It wasn’t until the 1500s that they began to deviate and be differentiated in most English dialects, but not all. Scottish never did adopt the -st ending so continued to use again in the ways we would use against. Even so, again still retained its earlier meanings for quite a long time.

And that “once more” meaning we think of today? That didn’t join in until the 14th century, which is pretty late in life for the Old English word!

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Who Do We Hurt?

Who Do We Hurt?

In this charged political climate, I’m making an effort to read things from both sides of every issue. What am I finding? Aside from a disheartening amount of name-calling on both sides, I’m finding that both sides also often have a solid point.

Usually I have a knee-jerk reaction to a subject…but I then take a step back and ask, “Why is this my reaction?” And I read something from the opposite point of view.

A few weeks ago, there were varying reactions to a statement from the Vice President saying that loving our own first is a very Christian principle. I read reactions renouncing this. I read reactions affirming it. Both quoted from the Bible in their defense.

Because, yes, Jesus calls us to love our enemy and points out that sometimes those supposed enemies turn out to be our neighbors.

And, yes, Paul also tells us we must care for our families and communities.

I let all the ideas swirl around in my head for several days, and then my husband shared a reaction he read. One that really resonated. To paraphrase, it was this:

Yes, we are called to care for our own. But not at the cost of others.

Protect your family–but don’t hurt another family to do it.

Feed your community–but don’t steal food from another to accomplish it.

This helped me immensely to put it all in perspective. As I’ve noted before, there are a million good things demanding our time and attention, righteous things, Godly things. But we simply don’t have enough–time, resources, or heart–to give to them all. But when we choose the things we will support and champion, we don’t hurt the other causes to do so (or we shouldn’t, anyway).

To dig wells in Africa, we don’t propose finding slave labor from Asia to do it. To send clothing to the Arctic, we don’t rob those in the Andes.

Yes, there is a natural affection for our own–our town, our county, our state, our country. Yes, we need to take care of those around us.

But not at the expense of others.

And that’s what has brought me sorrow as I watch the name-calling, the tearing-down, the attitudes I’m seeing all over my country right now. That no one seems to care who they’re hurting–not each other in our own country, and all too often, not those outside it. I am grieved as I watch the behavior of people claiming to be Christians. Not because of what they’re doing, necessarily, but because of how they’re doing it. Because they are gleeful about causing others pain.

You know why it hurts my heart so much? Because we as Christians are not called to put our own country first. We are called to put GOD’S KINGDOM first. And do you know what God’s Kingdom on earth is?

The Church.

The Church should be where our first loyalty lies. And yet I see so many believers putting their own agendas above all else and then claiming it’s of God. I see so many Christians claiming it’s for God that we treat others cruelly, because it’s necessary to protect what’s ours.

I see many of the actions being done and recognize that the end could be good. But the means matter, friends. The means ALWAYS matter. It doesn’t only matter who we HELP. It matters who we HURT in the process. That’s my new way (or new way of voicing, anyway) of determining which side to take on an issue. Why?

Because a few weeks ago, as I was praying over the outrage around us, the corruption, the greed, I asked the Lord, When is the right time for me to get angry? And I sensed Him clearly saying, Love them. That’s all you’re expected to do. Just love them.

Not just my friends, but my enemies. Not just our own, but the others. Not just those we agree with, but those we don’t understand.

Love them first. Love will give us understanding. Understanding will help us have honest dialogue. Honest dialogue will effect real change, lasting change, righteous change.

Let’s not settle for “getting our way.” Let’s strive to bring God’s way, God’s kingdom, into our every interaction.